Recent Posts

    Possible that dark energy could travel faster than light

    possible that dark energy could travel faster than light

    This question reveals a great deal of confusion about dark energy. Dark energy has Is it possible that dark energy could travel faster than light? If traveling faster than the speed of light were possible, would we be able to see.
    The answer to "is it possible?" is usually yes. Anything is possible if you don't think hard enough about it. Is it possible for a rock to turn into a chicken?.
    So, how can galaxies be traveling faster than the speed of light Perhaps it's dark energy acceleration, or the earliest inflationary So how it's possible to see the light from any galaxies moving faster than the speed of light...

    Possible that dark energy could travel faster than light - - journey fast

    Do we really know if and how is the dark matter moving relative to stars, galaxies and other arbitrary things? You might arguably be able to avoid this problem by blocking that sort of contact— Reynolds does this via magical and unexplained means, but modern cosmology offers a quasi-real method. The conventional SI system of units is based on seven basic dimensional quantities, namely distance , mass , time, electric current , thermodynamic temperature , amount of substance , and luminous intensity. In particular, in the quantum theory a smeared supertube is present that cuts the spacetime in such a way that, although in the full spacetime a closed timelike curve passed through every point, no complete curves exist on the interior region bounded by the tube.

    possible that dark energy could travel faster than light

    If you cross that barrier, then you are not in an inertial frame, and somebody who is and is therefore privileged over your non-inertial frame will see your arrow of time reverse. Gerald Cleaver, associate professor of physics at Baylor Universityand Richard Obousy, a Baylor graduate student, theorized that manipulating the extra spatial dimensions of string theory around a spaceship with an extremely large amount of energy would create a "bubble" that could cause the ship to travel faster than the speed of light. See, possible that dark energy could travel faster than light, while it's a wonderful way to express the expansion of the universe, there are some misconceptions that arise from it:. How the first black holes formed without stars How gravity can form more than one "shape" of structure without varying "how" it works. Space stations and habitats. I've also said "nothing can travel faster than the speed of light". The source of the paradoxes, after all, is having parties on both ends of the trip interact in some way, mixing faster-than-light and slower-than-light frames of reference. That may be telling. And then I'll say something like, " galaxies are moving away from us faster than the speed of light. There has sometimes been confusion concerning the latter point. Another possible system is the wormholewhich connects two distant locations as though by a shortcut. Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. Hydrogen halo lifts the veil of our galactic home. Wavefunction collapse can be viewed as an epiphenomenon of quantum decoherence, which in turn is nothing more than an effect of the underlying local shopping ford expedition orwell cheap evolution of the wavefunction of a system and all of its environment. Please include your IP address in your email.





    Will This Go Faster Than Light?


    Possible that dark energy could travel faster than light - tour


    Winful argues that the train analogy is a variant of the "reshaping argument" for superluminal tunneling velocities, but he goes on to say that this argument is not actually supported by experiment or simulations, which actually show that the transmitted pulse has the same length and shape as the incident pulse. Retrieved from " germantownalumni.org?

    Possible that dark energy could travel faster than light flying easy


    Please include your IP address in your email. But if you change the fine structure constant by too much, you would rule out the formation of stars as we known them— this is one of the things that always comes up in Anthropic Principle arguments— so any change would need to be much less than that. A classical "wave" which is propagating in any direction, and expanding in radius as it progresses, must lose "something" at any given point along the wave, as it expands through space, even without space expanding. There is a non-zero probability that the photon will tunnel across the gap rather than follow the refracted path. You could make all the superluminal jumping happen along a preferred foliation into spacelike surfaces, for instance: it would violate relativity, but maybe in a gentle enough way to not break existing physics too badly. Utopian and dystopian fiction.